The Limiters: Continuing the Work the Founders Began -
A Practical Amendment to Restore Balance and Accountability

Why Now?

Learning From the Past

In the late 1700s, the Anti-Federalists—the original Limiters—warned that the Constitution lacked explicit limits on federal taxing and spending. That omission helped create today’s fiscal crisis. The Limits Amendment addresses the flaw directly.

Before diving into the solution, consider the 1913 Income Tax Amendment (16th Amendment, or 16A). Courts held that it did not create new taxing powers; Congress already had authority to tax incomes. The real debate was always about scope:

Move Forward or Die

Whatever the arguments were before 16A, they became irrelevant after ratification. Yet tax protesters still recycle old claims as if courts and legislatures have forgotten history. The reality is simple: once ratified—even if imperfect—16A is the law of the land. There is no constitutional mechanism for officials to “decertify” it. Change comes only from the People, moving forward through amendment—not by judges unraveling the past.

What does “move forward” mean? Look to Prohibition (1920s-30s): the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th, but it did not erase it. If “un-ringing the bell” were possible, that would have been the moment—especially for a public with a strong understanding of civic duty.

Let’s Break the Amendment Down.

Why It Works

Why You?

The Limits Amendment is not radical; it is restorative. By refining rather than repealing, it charts a pragmatic path forward. Ready to limit government and unleash American potential? Your voice drives ratification. Join fiscal reform discussions, contact representatives, or organize petitions. Be a Limiter.

Act Now!

Visit fedlimits.com or email fedlimits@gmail.com.
#FedLimits #TheLimiters

The Text

The Limits Amendment puts a leash on 16A with permanently self-adjusting limits tied to the National Median Household Income (NMHI), around $85,000:

Federal Limits Chart
Federal Limits Chart (Expanded)